Ethical Decision Making & Medical Malpractice

Ethical Decision Making & Medical Malpractice Paper

Question Description

HCM 345 – Mod 4 – Please select either one, do not do both. Read the details and Rubric.

OPTION #1: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE

Medical malpractice laws vary from state to state. Research the medical malpractice laws in the state you live in or the state where you hope to work as a healthcare provider. Imagine that you are already working in the healthcare field. It is your responsibility to develop a training for new medical providers to complete before they are allowed to treat patients. The training will be computer generated and you are the voice over. Prepare a power point presentation that briefly covers the laws of medical malpractice in your state.

Identify and provide a thorough analysis of the key aspects of the law that medical providers need to be aware. Also include several strategies and rationales to prevent or avoid a medical malpractice lawsuit.

Your presentation should meet the following requirements:

Review the grading rubric, which can be accessed from the Module 4 folder.

Reach out to your instructor if you have any questions about the assignment.

OPTION #2: ETHICAL DECISION MAKING

Technology has had a profound effect on many of the advancements in the healthcare field. Select three ways that you feel these changes have been the most profound. In a brochure or infographic presentation, discuss the influence that each of these changes had had on a particular aspect of healthcare. Explore the impact on decision-making and ethical choices that are afforded to the patient and the healthcare provider’s or professional’s perception. Lastly, consider whether you feel that technology offers significant benefits, or produces new ethical dilemmas for healthcare. Include either a diagram, graphic or picture to demonstrate your ideas or to support the various types of technology that were identified and their influence on ethical decisions.

Your brochure or infographic presentation should meet the following requirements:

Review the grading rubric, which can be accessed from the Module 4 folder.

Reach out to your instructor if you have any questions about the assignment.

Rubric

HCM345 Mod 4 CT

HCM345 Mod 4 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
10.0 to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
25.0 to >20.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20.0 to >15.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

15.0 to >10.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

10.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
25.0 to >20.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking.

20.0 to >15.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

15.0 to >10.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

10.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical thinking.

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in Healthcare Ethics

16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

8.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples
10.0 to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8.0 to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0 to >4.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
5.0 to >4.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >3.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

3.0 to >2.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

2.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
5.0 to >4.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

4.0 to >3.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3.0 to >2.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

2.0 to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.