Doping in Sports & NFL Articles Summary and Reflection

Doping in Sports & NFL Articles Summary and Reflection

Select 2 current event articles pertaining to sports management. A 2-page (typed, double-spaced) summary/review is due for each article. These reports should include a summary of the articles, the importance of the subject matter, and the student’s personal opinion on the matter.

Quickwrite / Reflection Rubric
Quickwrite / Reflection Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Preparation

25 to >23 pts

Distinguished

Reflection entry shows evidence of thorough preparation through reading or reflection. Author speaks as one who has knowledge to share.23 to >20.75 pts

Proficient

Reflection entry shows evidence of preparation through reading or reflection. Author speaks as one who has knowledge to share.20.75 to >18.75 pts

Satisfactory

Reflection entry shows some evidence of preparation through reading or reflection. Author demonstrates some knowledge applicable to prompt.18.75 to >16.25 pts

Marginal

Reflection entry shows little evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.16.25 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Reflection entry shows no evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.

/ 25 pts
Quality of content

25 to >23 pts

Distinguished

Reflection entry contains substantial information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s) completely.23 to >20.75 pts

Proficient

Reflection entry contains substantial information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s).20.75 to >18.75 pts

Satisfactory

Reflection entry contains some relevant information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s).18.75 to >16.25 pts

Marginal

Reflection entry contains minimal information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s) weakly.16.25 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Reflection entry contains minimal information for reader. The entry does not address the focus question(s).

/ 25 pts
Personal reflection

25 to >23 pts

Distinguished

Reflection entry conveys extensive evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s); demonstrates the author’s growth through reflection on learning.23 to >20.75 pts

Proficient

Reflection entry conveys evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s); demonstrates the author is capable of reflecting on learning.20.75 to >18.75 pts

Satisfactory

Reflection entry conveys evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s) with a few gaps in clarity; demonstrates the author is capable of some reflection on learning.18.75 to >16.25 pts

Marginal

Reflection entry conveys little evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s).16.25 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Reflection entry shows no personal response to the focus question(s).

/ 25 pts
Conventions (APA/Grammar/Spelling)

25 to >23 pts

Distinguished

Reflection entry shows few, if any errors in standard written English that do not interfered with understanding.23 to >20.75 pts

Proficient

Reflection entry may have some errors in standard written English that rarely interfere with understanding.20.75 to >18.75 pts

Satisfactory

Reflection entry has a few errors in standard written English that may interfere with understanding.18.75 to >16.25 pts

Marginal

Reflection entry has several kinds of errors in standard written English that interfere with understanding.16.25 to >0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Reflection entry has frequent and severe errors in standard written English that interfere with understanding.

/ 25 pts
Total Points: 0