Doping in Sports & NFL Articles Summary and Reflection
Doping in Sports & NFL Articles Summary and Reflection
Select 2 current event articles pertaining to sports management. A 2-page (typed, double-spaced) summary/review is due for each article. These reports should include a summary of the articles, the importance of the subject matter, and the student’s personal opinion on the matter.
| Quickwrite / Reflection Rubric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| Preparation | 25 to >23 pts
Distinguished Reflection entry shows evidence of thorough preparation through reading or reflection. Author speaks as one who has knowledge to share.23 to >20.75 pts Proficient Reflection entry shows evidence of preparation through reading or reflection. Author speaks as one who has knowledge to share.20.75 to >18.75 pts Satisfactory Reflection entry shows some evidence of preparation through reading or reflection. Author demonstrates some knowledge applicable to prompt.18.75 to >16.25 pts Marginal Reflection entry shows little evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.16.25 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Reflection entry shows no evidence of preparation through reading or reflection. |
/ 25 pts |
| Quality of content | 25 to >23 pts
Distinguished Reflection entry contains substantial information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s) completely.23 to >20.75 pts Proficient Reflection entry contains substantial information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s).20.75 to >18.75 pts Satisfactory Reflection entry contains some relevant information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s).18.75 to >16.25 pts Marginal Reflection entry contains minimal information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s) weakly.16.25 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Reflection entry contains minimal information for reader. The entry does not address the focus question(s). |
/ 25 pts |
| Personal reflection | 25 to >23 pts
Distinguished Reflection entry conveys extensive evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s); demonstrates the author’s growth through reflection on learning.23 to >20.75 pts Proficient Reflection entry conveys evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s); demonstrates the author is capable of reflecting on learning.20.75 to >18.75 pts Satisfactory Reflection entry conveys evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s) with a few gaps in clarity; demonstrates the author is capable of some reflection on learning.18.75 to >16.25 pts Marginal Reflection entry conveys little evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s).16.25 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Reflection entry shows no personal response to the focus question(s). |
/ 25 pts |
| Conventions (APA/Grammar/Spelling) | 25 to >23 pts
Distinguished Reflection entry shows few, if any errors in standard written English that do not interfered with understanding.23 to >20.75 pts Proficient Reflection entry may have some errors in standard written English that rarely interfere with understanding.20.75 to >18.75 pts Satisfactory Reflection entry has a few errors in standard written English that may interfere with understanding.18.75 to >16.25 pts Marginal Reflection entry has several kinds of errors in standard written English that interfere with understanding.16.25 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Reflection entry has frequent and severe errors in standard written English that interfere with understanding. |
/ 25 pts |
| Total Points: 0 | ||
