Healthcare Policies Blog Post & Specific Goals Essay

/in /by

I’m studying for my Health & Medical class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

 

Unit 5 Assignment – Healthcare Policies Blog Post

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 90
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

Instructions

Staff professional development is part of the role of the manager. In this assessment, assume the role of the manager. On the company’s internal website, there is a staff blog for updates on policies and procedures. Create a post to inform employees regarding current healthcare policies and managed care.

Evaluation Title: Healthcare Policies Blog Post

Instructions:

  • Write a blog post the includes the following:
    • A description of one current healthcare policy and expected outcomes.
    • An explanation of how the policy impacts MCO.
    • An analysis of the impact managed care has on health care insurance and reimbursement policy.
  • Utilize layman’s language for the post to ensure any employee within the organization can understand the information presented.
  • Complete additional research on this topic, utilizing a minimum of 3 sources support ideas presented.

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

Rubric

HC433 Unit 5 Assignment – Healthcare Policies Blog Post

HC433 Unit 5 Assignment – Healthcare Policies Blog Post
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
50.0 ptsLevel 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

 45.0 ptsLevel 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

 40.0 ptsLevel 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

 35.0 ptsLevel 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

 30.0 ptsLevel 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.
50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
30.0 ptsLevel 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 27.0 ptsLevel 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 24.0 ptsLevel 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 21.0 ptsLevel 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

 18.0 ptsLevel 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5.0 ptsLevel 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 4.5 ptsLevel 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 4.0 ptsLevel 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

 3.5 ptsLevel 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 3.0 ptsLevel 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
5.0 ptsLevel 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

 4.5 ptsLevel 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 4.0 ptsLevel 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.5 ptsLevel 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.0 ptsLevel 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

 0.0 ptsLevel 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 90.0