Distinguish between the recommendations for hypertension management among recent hypertension-and disease-specific guidelines

Distinguish between the recommendations for hypertension management among recent hypertension-and disease-specific guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of the activity is to provide students with the opportunity to compare & contrast two common but different hypertension clinical practice guidelines.

Activity Learning Outcomes

Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

Distinguish between the recommendations for hypertension management among recent hypertension-and disease-specific guidelines. (1, 2, 3, & 6)

Requirements:

  1. Do a web search to locate the current JNC8 and ACC/AHA guidelines for hypertension.
  2. Compare and contrast the two sets of guidelines according to the following:
    • Define the classes of hypertension (normal, elevated, stage 1 & stage 2) according to each guideline.
    • What are the thresholds for initiating treatment?
    • What are the treatment goals? (Hint: there may be multiple treatment goals based on certain populations such as diabetics)
    • What medications are recommended to treat hypertension in the African American population?
    • Discuss why one set of guidelines might be used over the other (i.e., is one superior to the other?)

 

DISCUSSION CONTENT
Category Points % Description
Compare & Contrast  65 65% The student:

·     Defines the classes of hypertension (normal, elevated, stage 1 & stage 2) according to each guideline.

·     Identifies the thresholds for initiating treatment according to each guideline.

·     Identifies the treatment goals according to each guideline (there may be multiple goal based on certain populations).

·     Identifies the medications recommended to treat hypertension in the African American population according to each guideline.

·     Discusses why one set of guidelines might be used over the other.

(5 required elements)

 

Scholarly Support &  Interactive Dialogue 25 25% ·     Discussion post is supported with appropriate sources*^;

·     Source is published within the last 5 years

·     Reference list is provided and in-text citations match; Student provides a substantive** response to at least one topic-related post of a peer

·     Student responds to all direct faculty questions OR if student was not asked a direct question student responds to either a 2nd peer post or a faculty question directed towards another student

 

* Textbooks, non-US journals, nursing journals not intended for advanced practice providers. ^ State specific websites from regulatory boards are acceptable) 

 

** A substantive post adds new content or insights to the discussion thread and information from student’s original post is not reused in peer or faculty response 

  90 90% Total CONTENT Points= 90
DISCUSSION FORMAT
Category Points % Description
Grammar, Syntax, Spelling, APA Format & Punctuation 10 10% Discussion post has minimal grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation,  or APA format errors*

 

(*) APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.

  10 10% Total FORMAT Points= 10 pts
  100 100% DISCUSSION TOTAL=______out of 100 points

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompare & Contrast

Defines the classes of hypertension (normal, elevated, stage 1 & stage 2) according to each guideline.

Identifies the thresholds for initiating treatment according to each guideline.

Identifies the treatment goals according to each guideline (there may be multiple goal based on certain populations).

Identifies the medications recommended to treat hypertension in the African American population according to each guideline.

Discusses why one set of guidelines might be used over the other.

(5 required elements)

65 pts

Excellent

All 5 required elements are present.

59 pts

V. Good

4 required elements are present.

54 pts

Satisfactory

3 required elements are present.

33 pts

Needs Improvement

1-2 required elements are present.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

0 required elements are present.

65 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Support & Interactive Dialogue

• Discussion post is supported with appropriate sources*^
• Source is published within the last 5 years;
• Reference list is provided and in-text citations match
• Student provides a substantive** response to at least one topic-related post of a peer
• Student responds to all direct faculty questions OR if student was not asked a direct question student responds to either a 2nd peer post or a faculty question directed towards another student

(5 required elements)

* Textbooks, non-US journals, nursing journals not intended for advanced practice providers.

** A substantive post adds new content or insights to the discussion thread and information from student’s original post is not reused in peer or faculty response

25 pts

Excellent

All 5 required elements are present.

23 pts

V. Good

4 required elements are present.

21 pts

Satisfactory

3 required elements are present.

13 pts

Needs Improvement

1-2 required elements are present.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

0 required elements are present.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion Format

Discussion post has minimal grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format errors^^

^^ APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.

10 pts

Excellent

Discussion post contains 0-1 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation or APA format.

9 pts

V. Good

Discussion post contains 2-3 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation or APA format.

8 pts

Satisfactory

Discussion post contains 4-6 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation or APA format.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Discussion post contains 7-9 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation or APA format.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Discussion post contains 10 or more errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation or APA format.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion late penalty deductions

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wed., regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTotal Participation Responses

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts